1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Taxing Income
Bill Batt: The Fallacy of the "Three-Legged Stool" Metaphor
Contemporary economists and conventional tax theorists well recognize
that taxing Labor and Capital is detrimental to economic vitality — politicians
thrive on repeating this ad
nauseam. Currently the Republican party candidates seem
best able to exploit resentment about the negative impact of
taxes. But they are not alone in failing to appreciate the nature
of tax shifting. What all fail to realize is that there are
notable exceptions to the rule that taxes are oppressive: any tax
imposed on an inelastic base — that is, any form of Land — constitutes
no distortion or excess burden whatsoever.
Far from spreading the burden of distribution over a wide array of tax bases, the ideal tax, then, should be imposed solely on those factors of production that form an inelastic base, i.e., that constitute forms of Land -- whether they be locational sites, natural resources, the spectrum, time slots, or others as they may arise in the future. Land, in any of its forms, is totally inelastic. Will Rogers in his pithy way said it well, "Buy land. They ain't making any more of the stuff." Mark Twain said it too. Read the whole article Mason Gaffney: Full Employment, Growth And Progress On A Small Planet: Relieving Poverty While Healing The Earth By
loading the Federal tax burden on
labor, while sparing capital, Congress creates a universal bias for
cities and counties to see purely proletarian labor as a “fiscal
deficit generator,” a parasite to repel, while capital and
housing for the rich generate local fiscal surpluses. The
resulting
local biases toward selective growth policies are well known, but
most advocates of housing for the poor are merely hacking at the
branches of evil, ignoring the roots in Federal tax policies. Read
the whole article
Fred Foldvary: Underprivileged or Rights-Deprived? Poor folk are often labeled
"underprivileged" and richer folk are called "privileged." For example,
there is a book titled "One Nation,
Underprivileged: Why American Poverty Affects Us All."
But "privileged" and "underprivileged" are confused and misleading
expressions. If you think the poor are "underprivileged," then you
don't really understand poverty.
What is a "privilege?" The term originally meant "private law." A privilege is a special advantage or prerogative or immunity or benefit given only to some people only because they have power or are favored by those with power. If everyone is entitled to something, like freedom of expression, or if everyone may obtain an item such as a passport with the same rules applying to all, then it is not a privilege but a right. Whether a rich person is "privileged" depends on how he got the money. ... So if a person is poor, it is not because he is lacking in special protections, subsidies, and other privileges. A person is usually poor because he has been deprived of the natural right to work. Governments world-wide impose barriers between labor and productive resources, keeping some workers deprived of labor and others who do work deprived of their earnings from labor. Taxes on wages create a wedge between the cost of labor to employers and the take-home pay of the worker. More costly labor results in less employment. Taxes on the income from capital goods and on the sale of goods has the same effect. There are unemployment taxes, disability taxes, and payroll taxes that increase the tax wedge. On top of that, there are minimum-wage laws that prevent the least productive workers from getting hired. There are permits, zoning, and other rules and costs that also prevent some workers from becoming self-employed. Deprived of the full natural right to peaceful enterprise and labor, and the natural right to fully keep one's earnings, the poor have little or no income, and depend on charity and governmental assistance. To call them "underprivileged" is a lie. The rights-deprived poor do not need privileges. They just need government to stop interfering with their right to work and save! ... The really underprivileged folks are all consumers, taxpayers and those who are restricted from peaceful and honest practices or have to pay extra to the government while others are unrestricted and non-taxed. These people lack privileges which others have. The proper remedy is not to expand privileges, but to eliminate all governmental privileges. That is why libertarians and geoists alike have the motto: "Equal rights for all; privileges for none!"Read the whole article The Most Rev. Dr Thomas Nulty, Roman Catholic Bishop of Meath (Ireland): Back to the Land (1881) I have already shown that the
land of every country is the public
property of the people of that country, and consequently, that its
exclusive appropriation by a class is a substantial injustice and
wrong done to every man in that country", whom it robs of his fair
share of the common inheritance. The injustice of this appropriation
is enormously enhanced by the fact that it further enables the
landlords, without any risk or trouble, and in fact makes it a matter
of course for them, to appropriate a vast share of the earnings of
the nation besides. They plundered the people first of God's gifts in
the land, and that act of spoliation puts them under a sort of
necessity of plundering them again of an enormous amount of their
direct earnings and wages. The line of argument that leads directly
to this conclusion seems abundantly clear. ...
Now a system of Land Tenure which
thus despoils the people of a
nation of a vast amount of their earnings, which transfers a valuable
property which they have created by patient, painful and selfdenying
efforts of their labour, to a class who do not labour at all, and
make no sacrifices whatever, can, I think, be fairly characterised as
a system of national spoliation. The hardworking, industrious masses
of the nation are taxed twice, and for an enormous amount each time.
They are taxed first for the benefit of the owners of the soil, to
supply them with all the comforts, enjoyments and luxuries which they
desire, and are taxed again to the amount of eighty millions annually
for the government and defence of the country. Read
the whole letter
|
|
to
email this page to a friend: right click, choose "send"
|
||||||
Wealth
and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy
alone hasn't yet led to a society in which all can
prosper
|