1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Injustice
of Current Taxes a synopsis of Robert V. Andelson and James M. Dawsey: From Wasteland to Promised land: Liberation Theology for a Post-Marxist World To
recognize that "the earth is the Lord's" is to see that the same God
who established communities has also in his providence ordained for
them, through the land itself, a just source of revenue. Yet, in the
Wasteland in which we live, this revenue goes mainly into the pockets
of monopolists, while communities meet their needs by extorting
individuals the fruits of their honest toil. If ever there were any
doubt that
structural sin exists, our present system of taxation is the proof.
Everywhere we see governments penalizing individuals for their industry
and creativity, while the socially produced value of land is reaped by
speculators in exact proportion to the land which they withhold. The
greater the Wasteland, the greater the reward. Does this comport with
any divine plan, or notion of justice and human rights? Or does it not,
rather, perpetuate the Wasteland and prevent the realization of the
Promised Land?
This not meant to suggest that land monopolists and speculators have a corner on acquisitiveness or the "profit motive," which is a well-nigh universal fact of human nature. As a group, they are no more sinful than are people at large, except to the degree that they knowingly obstruct reforms aimed at removing the basis of exploitation. Many abide by the dictum: "If one has to live under a corrupt system, it is better to be a beneficiary than a victim of it." But they do not have to live under a corrupt system; no one does. The profit motive can be channeled in ways that are socially desirable as well as in ways that are socially destructive. Let us give testimony to our faith that the earth is the Lord's by building a social order in which there are no victims. Read the whole synopsis
Robert V. Andelson Henry George and the Reconstruction of Capitalism At present we have the
ironic spectacle of the community penalizing the individual for his industry
and initiative, and taking away from him a share of that which he produces,
while at the same time lavishing upon the nonproducer undeserved windfalls
which it -- the community -- produces. Henry George built his whole
program around the principle: Let the individual keep all of that which
he or she produces, and let the community keep all of that which it produces. ...
There are two things which a government can never do and still be just:
All wealth that is privately produced rightfully belongs to private individuals or corporations, and for the government to appropriate it is unjust. But land rent is publicly produced, and for the government to give it to private individuals or corporations is equally unjust. He who thinks himself prepared to justify in principle the private monopolization of land rent, must also be prepared to justify in principle the jobbery of the Tweed Ring and the looting of Teapot Dome -- not to mention the escapades of Michael Milken, Ivan Boesky, and Charles Keating. In closing, I will summarize with a quotation from the late Dr. Viggo Starke, for many years a member of the Danish cabinet: "What I produce is mine. All mine! What you produce is yours. All yours! But that which none of us produced, but which we all lend value to together, belongs by right to all of us in common." This, in a nutshell, is the philosophy of Henry George.Read the whole article
|
|
to
email this page to a friend: right click, choose "send"
|
||||||
Wealth
and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy
alone hasn't yet led to a society in which all can
prosper
|