Political Machines
Henry George was well acquainted with political machines. He ran twice for mayor of New York City, first in 1886; he came in second to the Tammany Hall candidate, and beat the young Theodore Roosevelt, who, later in his life, would run for president on a platform that was strongly Georgist (it is said that he learned his single tax from Bucky O'Neil, a single-taxer who died a hero at San Juan Hill). George died a few days before the election of 1897, the first after New York City's boroughs were united into a single entity.
Henry George: Political
Dangers (Chapter 2 of Social Problems,
1883)
[14] The people, of course, continue to vote; but the people are losing their
power. Money and organization tell more and more in elections. In some sections
bribery has become chronic, and numbers of voters expect regularly to sell
their votes. In some sections large employers regularly bulldoze their hands
into voting as they wish. In municipal, State and Federal politics the power
of the "machine" is increasing. In many places it has become so strong
that the ordinary citizen has no more influence in the government under which
he lives than he would have in China. He is, in reality, not one of the governing
classes, but one of the governed. He occasionally, in disgust, votes for "the
other man," or "the other party;" but, generally, to find that
he has effected only a change of masters, or secured the same masters under
different names. And he is beginning to accept the situation, and to leave
politics to politicians, as something with which an honest, self-respecting
man cannot afford to meddle.
[15] We are steadily differentiating a governing class, or rather a class
of Pretorians, who make a business of gaining political power and then selling
it. The type of the rising party leader is not the orator or statesman of an
earlier day, but the shrewd manager, who knows how to handle the workers, how
to combine pecuniary interests, how to obtain money and to spend it, how to
gather to himself followers and to secure their allegiance. One party machine
is becoming complementary to the other party machine, the politicians, like
the railroad managers, having discovered that combination pays better than
competition. So rings are made impregnable and great pecuniary interests secure
their ends no matter how elections go. There are sovereign States so completely
in the hands of rings and corporations that it seems as if nothing short of
a revolutionary uprising of the people could dispossess them. Indeed, whether
the General Government has not already passed beyond popular control may be
doubted. Certain it is that possession of the General Government has for some
time past secured possession. And for one term, at least, the Presidential
chair has been occupied by a man not elected to it. This, of course, was largely
due to the crookedness of the man who was elected, and to the lack of principle
in his supporters. Nevertheless, it occurred. ... read the entire essay
|
To
share this page with a friend: right click, choose "send," and
add your comments.
|
|
Red
links have not been visited; .
Green
links are pages you've seen |
Essential Documents
pertinent to this theme:
essential_documents |
|