Thomas Shearman
a founding partner of the law firm Shearman and Sterling,
Louis Post: Outlines of Louis F. Post's
Lectures,
with Illustrative Notes and Charts (1894)
Note 2: In "Progress and Poverty," book viii, ch. iv, Henry
George speaks of "the effect of substituting for the manifold taxes
now imposed, a single tax on the value of land"; but the term did not
become a distinctive name until 1888.
The first general movement along the lines of "Progress and Poverty" began
New York City election of 1886, when Henry George polled 68,110 votes as
an independent candidate for mayor, and was defeated by the Democratic candidate,
Abram S. Hewitt, by a plurality of only 22,442, the Republican, Theodore
Roosevelt, polling but 60,435. Following that election the United Labor Party
was formed, the Syracuse Convention in August, 1887, by the exclusion of
the Socialists, came to present the central idea of "Progress and
Poverty" as
distinguished from the Socialistic propaganda which until then was identified
with it. Coincident with the organization of the United Labor Party the Anti-Poverty
Society was formed; and the two bodies, one representing the political and
the other the religious phase of the idea, worked together until President
Cleveland's tariff message of 1887 appeared. In this message Mr. George saw
the timid beginnings of that open struggle between protection and free trade
to which he had for years looked forward as the political movement that must
culminate in the abolition of all taxes save those upon land values, and
he responded at once to the sentiments of the message. But many protectionists,
who had followed him because they supposed he was a land nationalizer, now
broke away from his leadership, and the United Labor Party and the Anti-Poverty
Society were soon practically dissolved. Those who understood Mr. George's
real position regarding the land question readily acquiesced in his views
as to political policy, and a considerable movement resulted, which, however,
for some time lacked an identifying name. This was the situation when Thomas
G. Shearman, Esq., wrote for the Standard an article on taxation in which
he illustrated and advocated the land value tax as a fiscal measure. The
article had been submitted without a caption, and Mr. George, then the editor
of the Standard, entitled it "The Single Tax." This title was at
once adopted by the "George men," as they were often called, and
has ever since served as the name of the movement it describes. ...
To retain Rent for common use it is not necessary to abolish land-titles,
nor to let land out to the highest bidder, nor to invent some new mechanism
of taxation, nor in any other way to directly change existing modes of
holding land for use, or existing machinery for collecting public revenues. "Great
changes can be best brought about under old forms."109 Let land be
held nominally as it is now. Let taxes be collected by the same kind of
machinery as now. But abolish all taxes except those that fall upon actual
and potential Rent, that is to say, upon land values.
110. Thomas G. Shearman, Esq., of New York, author of
the famous magazine article on "Who Owns the United States," estimates that sixty-five
per cent of the present annual value of the land in the United States would
pay all the present expenses of American government — federal, state,
county, and municipal.
Q2. Would the single tax yield revenue sufficient for all kinds of government?
A. Thomas G. Shearman, Esq., of New York, estimates that sixty-five per cent
of the rent that the land in the United States now yields actually and
potentially to its owners, would be sufficient. But whether it would or
not is as yet an unimportant question. If all revenues ought to be raised
from land values, then no revenues should be drawn from other sources while
any land value remains in private possession. Until land values are exhausted
the taxation of labor cannot be excused. ... read
the book
Charles B. Fillebrown: A Catechism
of Natural Taxation, from Principles of
Natural Taxation (1917)
Q57. Would the single tax yield sufficient revenue for all government
purposes, local, state, and national?
A. Careful estimates by Mr. Thomas G. Shearman indicate that all present taxes
amount to not much more than one half of the annual site value of the land. But
he said:
The honest needs of public government grow faster than population and
fully as fast as wealth itself. Local taxation will increase rapidly; and
it ought to do so..... This does not imply that ground rent will not be
sufficient to supply many, possibly all, of those additions to human happiness
which Henry George has pictured in such glowing words. But such extensions
of the sphere of government must take place gradually; or they will be
ruinous failures, simply because the state cannot at once furnish the necessary
machinery for their successful operation. ... read
the whole article
|
To
share this page with a friend: right click, choose "send," and
add your comments.
|
related themes: see_also |
Red
links have not been visited; .
Green
links are pages you've seen |
Essential Documents
pertinent to this theme:
essential_documents |
|