1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Utilities
Mason Gaffney: Full
Employment, Growth And Progress On A Small Planet: Relieving Poverty
While Healing The Earth7. Value of urbanism.
Cities are the cores of specialization and exchange, which in
turn are the mainsprings of productivity and technical progress.
Urban land is therefore highly
productive, so that most land values
are found in cities. So are most of the best jobs, and investment
outlets.
Cities are the site of most “downstream” production, which uses more labor per unit of natural resources than the primary production outside cities. Modern “ecological footprint” thinking seems to deny or overlook this important fact. Cities earn their keep by providing the rest of the world with manufactures, medical care, education, research, and many other urban products and services that enhance rural output and welfare. (Even the Sierra Club and Audubon Society have downtown urban headquarters.) 8. Open space. Lands with open access (e.g. parks, and public rights-of-way) are already common property, and should not be taxed. Land taxes are needed only to compensate the landless for tenure – the right to exclude others – that society grants to the landed in preference to the landless. Common carriers, with rates regulated to reasonable levels, would seem to be a form of open access. In practise, the last point means that public utilities should be rate-regulated, instead of being taxed and then allowed to shift the taxes forward to customers. 9. Natural monopolies. Natural monopolies (a term going back to George’s harbinger, J.S. Mill) should be publicly owned, or regulated. Georgism as a political movement was closely allied with movements to lower urban mass transit fares and improve service, using if necessary the property tax base to cover deficits ... read the whole article Mason Gaffney: Oil and Gas Leasing: a Study in Pseudo-Socialism"Socialism," in common usage, is
a Protean word, slippery and
shifting. Many use it without defining it, whether from innocence,
negligence, or cunning. These many include not just the vulgar, but
most economists: semantic care is weak in the traditions of the
profession. "Rigorous" model-builders today are among the offenders:
the premium is on gilding the superstructure, neglecting the
foundation. Indeed, foundations are not even needed for models that
float in outer space, vouching for and communing mainly with each
other.
Those who do define Socialism, explicitly or implicitly, use the
word for different things. A major difference, treated here, is
between Managerial Socialism (who decides)
and
Distributive Socialism (who gets). These may
overlap,
but are independent of each other and often conflict. For example,
Riverside, CA, owns its own electric
utility (on whose Board I sit,
losing battles). This is Managerial Socialism, municipal style. Its
traditional rate structure includes large elements of cross-subsidy,
mainly taking from the lower middles for the rich, tempered by crumbs
thrown to the very poor. The same is true of our water system,
and of
most municipally owned and managed utilities around the nation. Water
and sewer service are common examples of Managerial Socialism (from
which the mnemonic "sewer socialism"). They have little in common
with Distributive Socialism.... Read the whole article
Charles B. Fillebrown: A Catechism of Natural Taxation, from Principles of Natural Taxation (1917)
|
|
to
email this page to a friend: right click, choose "send"
|
||||||
Wealth
and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy
alone hasn't yet led to a society in which all can
prosper
|