1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Social
Surplus
Louis Post: Outlines of Louis F. Post's Lectures, with Illustrative Notes and Charts (1894)
Mason Gaffney: Land as a Distinctive Factor of Production Physical
abuse of land is less a problem, actually, than the fall of
value that results from social decay. Much of land value is a
social product. When a society sickens, declines, and
self-destructs, as we know may happen, it lowers ground rents, which
mirror social progress and decay. We cannot surely forecast that
our own society will not self-destruct, as parts of cities already
have. However, until it does, land will outlast capital
economically. Even when it does, landownership may remain the
last
bastion, as happened in the feudal system. Even if barbarians
overrun us, it is the land they will take: little else will
remain. ...
Usually the given flow is steady or seasonal, but not always or necessarily. Seasons change, climates change, environments change, blights and pestilences come and go. The essence of land service flow is not steadiness, but exogeneity. Alfred Marshall defined the "public value of land" as the product of three factors exogenous to the private owner: nature, public services, and spillovers from the use of nearby private land. This "neoclassical" was classically right on this point (great economists seldom fit snugly into tight boxes). ... Read the whole article Mason Gaffney: Rent, Taxation, Dissipation and Federalism I. The issue
II. Sources of rent III. Dissipation of rent before the fisc takes it: what and how? A. Dissipation means waste and
destruction or suppression.
IV. Dissipating rent via public spendingB. How rent is dissipated. C. Open access followed by tenure: rent-seeking institutions. A. Taxes and lease provisions
need not twist incentives.
V. SolutionsB. Public spending of tax proceeds may dissipate rent. C. History of recognition of this spending effect D. Successful compromises with the principle. 1. Barriers to immigration or
sharing.
E. Less successful compromises with the principle2. Selling voters on the benefits of immigration 1. Public works.
2. Subsidized public works in tandem with exclusionary zoning 3. Hocking the revenues A. Socialize rent at the
national level.
B. Limit benefits to citizens per se (not to landowners per se). C. A social dividend to citizens is the obvious route. D. Return rents to local school districts in inverse proportion to local tax base per capita (the Colin Clark principle). E. Promote James Madison and Neville Chamberlain to elder statesmen emeritus. ... I premise resource rents are
the joint product of three
distinguishable factors:
Walter Rybeck: The Uncertain Future of the Metropolis The single element that makes me
apprehensive about the future of our cities is our land system.
Tentacles
of our misguided land policies are choking almost every vital aspect of
metropolitan life. This is doubly worrisome, because the full
dimensions of the land problem have barely surfaced in the public
consciousness. To put it in the
vernacular, most of us don't know what's eating us.
We have scarcely begun to identify the causes of today's city land problems. This is not to denigrate the legions of good folk -- officials and citizens alike -- who are trying desperately to cope with the daily disasters. But without a better notion of what is producing these disasters, we are unlikely to stem the flood. A major problem, certainly, is our distorted land system that operates around the clock and around the calendar, and under the full sanction of the law. It rips off the poor, saps small business, and deprives municipalities of their rightful revenue. The people as a whole create land values, not only by their presence, but also through participation in government, as taxpayers. Schools, firehouses, streets, police, water lines -- the whole gamut of public works and services that enhance a neighborhood are converted into higher land values. The taxpayers of the entire country, through federal aid for our multi-billion-dollar Metrorail project, have been boosting Washington, D.C. land values mightily. Not all land values are manmade. Inherent qualities also give land special advantages: fertile soils in farming districts, scenic views in residential areas, subsurface riches of coal, oil, and minerals. None of us, as landlords, tenants, or governments, can lay claim to having created these values. The people who have been drawing up an international law of the Seas have characterized these natural endowments as "the common heritage of mankind", where no people, individually or collectively, produce these land values, it is difficult to argue with the conclusion that they belong to all people equally. If the institution of private property has a sound foundation, and I believe it does, then it rests on the principle that people have a right to reap what they sow, to retain for themselves what they themselves produce or earn. Land values, produced by all of society, and by nature, do not conform to this prescription. ... Decade after decade, billions of dollars in urban land values are being siphoned off by a narrowing class that has no ethical or economic claim to them. To be outraged when a few ghetto dwellers, in an occasional frenzy of despair, engage in looting on a relatively miniscule scale, but to remain indifferent to this massive, wholesale looting, is worse than hypocritical. It is to ignore a catastrophic social maladjustment, more severe, I believe, than anything the U.S. has experienced since slavery. ... But I sense that we are drifting rapidly towards a landlord-dominated society. ... Before that happens, the opportunity awaits to see whether a reasonably free economy can still be made to work. Unless we tackle the land question, and the looting of America, that game may be forfeited. The future of the metropolis is uncertain. The choice is ours. We can intervene in the way society is now headed, to preserve the American dream. Or, we can continue along the present path and await the American nightmare. Read the whole article |
|
to
email this page to a friend: right click, choose "send"
|
||||||
Wealth
and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy
alone hasn't yet led to a society in which all can
prosper
|